—
7 \\ 7% DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
KES DEP, ENT OF THE
ae Wa BOARD FOR, CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. GOURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO8329-13
15 September 2015
|
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
deceased spouse's naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10
September 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased spouse's
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The
Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor
Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13) memo of 17 Jul
2014, a copy of which was provided to ‘you en 11 Aug 2014. You had the
opportunity to respond within 30 days, but failed to do so.
Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In
this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption
of regularity attaches to all official records. Conseguently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
LAK
ROBERT J. ONEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
a
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5473 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4350 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1007 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered the application on 12 May 2014. regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. - After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1036 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ~ Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for @ correction of an official naval record, the purden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error of injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3463 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01778-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 6 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In response to reference (a)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10626-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05623-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This responds to your request (enclosure (1)) for comments and recommendation on subject Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) petition. Applicant has failed to furnish the Board with evidence which supports her petition.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08028-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2010. Therefore, under these circumstances, the Board found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant relief. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09563-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This statement identified him as a participant in the SBP Children only coverage, and he took no action to enroll his spouse.